|
(Viene de la página 9)
passes parallel to two riverbeds (the river and the channel) and between two ways (a small path re-drawn of trodden anonymous and the walk on the banks of the Lérez).
This space of thought summons three spaces and three times of look: the pedestrian one (social-interpersonal relation) the walk; the fluvial (native) the river; the circulatory one (vial) the highway.
If we sit down in the bank looking at the opposite we can discover other three spaces, three times and three lools different from the previous ones: the pedestrian (individual-individual one) the path; the fluvial (constructed one) the channel; circulatory (university student) the University.
An opposite line of nobody and of all, we spread of rest between two couples of process in movement: two of thinking up (meditating) fluvial (the river and the channel); two of travelling (the walk and the path).
The row of banks constitutes a space of reflection between two couples of territories: two natives (the vegetation and the water); two urban (the highway and the campus)..
All 96 judgments recorded on the banks accentuate the daily thing, supporting as topic of bottom the human relations among individuals. The phrases columned, they are seemingly unconnected, though, its conjunction provokes different levels of senses, in certain way ambiguous, that are concentrating when the reader distinguishes them relating to their own opinions and experiences. This is, they form an atmosphere: indefinite definition of these current certainties. These prayers operate as key for the reflection, as questions on what it surrounds us.
Since it is not habitual, in these texts either, Holzer leaves us to hear her opinion. She does not perwsonalize the message, but she replaces.her voice with ours because she is not interested in a determined response: here she exposes a wide set of opinions with which she tries to come to the persons´major possible number. And she throws these opinions to the public-reader in order that this one go into the game. In her messages worry is present for the man in oneself, especially in his troubled relations with other men and toemendo always, like framework -in both cases ours today socials.
As Holzer was assuring the being interviewed for J.Siegel, her intentions in the series "Truisms" were: "I was trying to whow that the truths as are experienced by the individuals they are valid. I wanted to give the same weight in its possibilities to every affirmation".
|
|